Do any of the arguments resonate with you? Why or why not?

Personally none of them really resonated with me. As i've been living here for 7 years i never felt a fear of having my privacy invaded by the government. Maybe it's just my lack of interest in politics and all. To me it just seems a bit silly, i feel like all the information the government can get out of my personal life seems pretty useless. Only part that slightly made me re-think was the Luddite argument. I'm somewhat confused on "people’s permanent physical characteristics could be in the hands of criminals". I just don't see any connection between losing the biometric data and the criminals using our characteristics. But overall, it was an indifferent topic to me.
 
Personally, i never cared about whatever was happening with gays/lesbians in this world. I never really related to them, and just saw them to be the same as every other person in the world. I just thought it was a normal and not a lot of discrimination was happening in the current world. So apparently I'm wrong after reading the article, even though it's not happening right here in Canada, it was somewhat shocking to me. It's almost saddening that gays are tricked into humiliation and violence. But then again, i probably still wouldn't care a lot more in the future, but it helped me recognize the things that are happening in other countries.