Do any of the arguments resonate with you? Why or why not?
Personally none of them really resonated with me. As i've been living here for 7 years i never felt a fear of having my privacy invaded by the government. Maybe it's just my lack of interest in politics and all. To me it just seems a bit silly, i feel like all the information the government can get out of my personal life seems pretty useless. Only part that slightly made me re-think was the Luddite argument. I'm somewhat confused on "people’s permanent physical characteristics could be in the hands of criminals". I just don't see any connection between losing the biometric data and the criminals using our characteristics. But overall, it was an indifferent topic to me.
Personally none of them really resonated with me. As i've been living here for 7 years i never felt a fear of having my privacy invaded by the government. Maybe it's just my lack of interest in politics and all. To me it just seems a bit silly, i feel like all the information the government can get out of my personal life seems pretty useless. Only part that slightly made me re-think was the Luddite argument. I'm somewhat confused on "people’s permanent physical characteristics could be in the hands of criminals". I just don't see any connection between losing the biometric data and the criminals using our characteristics. But overall, it was an indifferent topic to me.
RSS Feed